Patna High Court
Harendra KumarversusThe state of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs 10,000, two sureties and specified conditions.
Summary
Harendra Kumar was arrested on 9 April 2026 in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 370 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 and Sections 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The police stopped a Maruti Suzuki car, seized 651 litres of country‑made liquor and a mobile phone, and identified the accused as the person caught in the vehicle. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the car, that the FIR was fabricated, and that he had no involvement in the alleged offence. The prosecution opposed bail, citing a prior case against the petitioner, though he was on bail in that matter. The High Court, after considering the circumstances, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation with the trial, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the excise offences alleged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise statutes.
- Whether the allegations in the FIR and the petitioner’s claim of non‑ownership of the vehicle constitute sufficient ground to deny bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s antecedent criminal case impacts the grant of bail in the present matter.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — s. 41(1), 41(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — s. 30(a), 32(3)
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- liquor seizure
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38804 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Harendra Kumar S/o Bisunpat Ram R/o Village- Rediya, P.S- Aurangabad
Muffasil, Dist- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The state of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
09.04.2026 in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 370
of 2026 for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) and
32(3) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018
and Sections 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act, 2016.
3. That the prosecution case in brief, as disclosed by
the informant in his written information is that on 8.4.2026,
while the informant was on patrolling and raiding duty. During
patrolling, the informant received a secret information about
bringing of liquor by one person on a Maruti Suzuki Car bearing
Reg.No. BR01AQ-8165.The informant informed the high
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38804 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
2/4
officials and reached at the place of information. The informant
saw the aforesaid car and gave a signal to stop but one person
sitting on the car tried to flee but was caught by the police, who
disclosed his name as Harendra Kumar. Thereafter a search was
made in Maruti Suzuki Car bearing Reg.No. BR01AQ-8165 and
during the search 651 liters of country made liquor & one
mobile was recovered. The person caught further disclosed that
the aforesaid car alongwith liquor was given to him for delivery
of the same at Ketaki More by one Nirmal Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is
further submitted that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is
forged and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any
offence as alleged in the FIR. It is further submitted that it
appears from the FIR that altogether 651 liters of country made
liquor & one mobile was recovered from the vehicle in question.
It is next submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the
driver of the vehicle in question and the vehicle in question
belong to one Farzan and petitioner has no concern at all with
the alleged vehicle in question and petitioner is in custody since
09.04.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38804 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
3/4
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case other than the
present case but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in the
pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned
Special Judge, Excise-II, Aurangabad in connection with Excise
Sadar P.S. Case No. 370 of 2026 subject to the following
conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38804 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
4/4
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.