Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, the mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, were arrested in a dowry‑death case under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the daughter‑in‑law was killed by her husband and in‑laws for non‑payment of a Rs.2 lakh dowry demand. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, had clean antecedents, and that the post‑mortem report showed no external injuries on the victim. The court examined these facts and, noting the lack of external injuries and the petitioners’ cooperation, ordered that they be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties. The bail was conditioned on their cooperation with the trial and availability when required by the court.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to accused persons in a dowry‑death case under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • dowry death
  • IPC 304B
  • Section 34
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • post‑mortem report
  • mother‑in‑law
  • father‑in‑law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38883 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2024 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Radhika Devi W/O Baban Ram Resident of Village- Piro, Ward no. 08, P.S.-
                  Piro, District- Bhojpur
           2.     Baban Ram S/O Late Chhabila Ram Resident of Village- Piro, Ward no. 08,
                  P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey
                 For the State            :        Md. Mushtaque Alam
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   05-01-2026                      Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

                   the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection

                   with S.Tr. No. 132 of 2025 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No. 223 of

                   2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   304(B)/34 of the IPC.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, informant’s daughter was

                   assaulted and killed by her husband and in-laws for non-fulfillment

                   of demand of dowry of Rs. 2 lakh.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

                   that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

                   this case. He has further submitted that petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-

                   law and petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law of the deceased and after

                   solemnization of marriage, the deceased and her husband were living
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38883 of 2025(5) dt.05-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       separately from the petitioners. It has further been submitted that

                       according to allegation, prior to her death, the victim was assaulted

                       but as per postmortem report, no external injury was found on the

                       person of the deceased. He has also submitted that the petitioners are

                       persons of clean antecedents and are under custody since 22.11.2024.

                                    5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                       opposed the prayer for bail.

                                    6. The petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of

                       the deceased and as per postmortem report, no external injury was

                       found on the dead body. Only nasal bleeding was there.

                                    7.    Considering       the    above-mentioned     facts    and

                       circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, are directed to

                       furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the

                       petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with

                       two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                       Additional Sessions Judge-X, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with

                       S.Tr. No. 132 of 2025 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No. 223 of 2024,

                       subject to the following conditions that             the petitioners    shall

                       cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as

                       and when required by the court.


                                            (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

priyanka/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.