Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Lalu Mahto and his sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Kari Devi. They later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the application for withdrawal be allowed. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition may be withdrawn with the court's permission

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39048 of 2024

                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                       Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.    Lalu Mahto Son of Ram Uchit Mahto Resident of Village- Manjhla Bigha,
                 P.S- Pandarak, District- Patna
           2.    Ajit Kumar Son of Lalu Mahto Resident of Village- Manjhla Bigha, P.S-
                 Pandarak, District- Patna
           3.    Sujit Kumar Son of Lalu Mahto Resident of Village- Manjhla Bigha, P.S-
                 Pandarak, District- Patna
           4.    Akhilesh Kumar Son of Lalu Mahto Resident of Village- Manjhla Bigha,
                 P.S- Pandarak, District- Patna


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Kari Devi Wife of Chhotu Mahto Resident of Village- Manjhla Bigha, P.S-
                 Pandarak, District- Patna


                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Shweta Barnwal, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   03-02-2026                     Ms. Shweta Barnwal, learned assisting counsel of

                   Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate on record, submits that she

                   may be permitted to withdraw the application.

                                 2. Permission is accorded.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39048 of 2024(2) dt.03-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. As prayed for, the petition stands dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.