Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Laxman Sahani @ Lakshman SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Laxman Sahani, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 80 litres of country‑made liquor and two gas cylinders, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution identified him as one of the persons who fled the scene, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the name was supplied by a hostile chowkidar, and that the procedural safeguards under Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. were not observed. He also argued that nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and cited his two prior criminal antecedents, for which he was already on bail. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides and reviewing the record, the Court held that bail should be granted, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The application for regular bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the facts of the case.
  • Whether the procedural requirements under Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. were complied with.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • procedural lapse
  • criminal antecedents
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39073 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2024 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Laxman Sahani @ Lakshman Sahni S/o Rambabu Sahani R/o Village -Bintoli
                 (Chailaha),Ward No. 04 P.S. -Banjaria ,District- East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Asif Kalim, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case

                   No. 15 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, total 80 litres of

                   country made liquor and two gas cylinders were recovered near

                   the bank of river. The petitioner was identified to be one of the

                   persons who fled away from the place of seizure.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case. It has further been submitted that the name of the

                   petitioner was disclosed by the local chowkidar with whom the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39073 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioner has enmity. It has next been submitted that the

                        procedure prescribed under Sections 103/105 of the B.N.S.S.

                        has not been followed. It has also been submitted that nothing

                        has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

                        petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has

                        got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail and he is in

                        custody since 02.05.2026.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                        the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                                     7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on

                        furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned Court concerned, East Champaran, in connection with

                        Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2024.

                                     8. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.