Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail, holding that the absence of conscious physical possession of the illicit liquor precludes a strong case for denial of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on a disclosure by a co‑accused, with no evidence of the petitioner’s conscious possession of the seized liquor. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the recovery was not linked to his personal control and that only suspicion existed. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The court noted the lack of direct possession and, applying Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, directed that the petitioner be released on bail if arrested within four weeks, upon furnishing a bail bond and sureties. Consequently, anticipatory bail was effectively granted subject to conditions.

Issues considered

  • What is the applicability of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC when the accused’s alleged involvement is based solely on a co‑accused’s disclosure and no conscious possession is established?
  • Whether the facts disclosed in the FIR under IPC sections 272, 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • conscious possession
  • IPC 272
  • IPC 273
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • CrPC Section 438

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39167 of 2026

                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2006 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar Singh, Son of Late Dharmnath Singh, Resident
                 of Village-Jalalpur, P.S.- Duraundha, District- Saran.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Rasulpur P.S.

                   Case No.60 of 2006 registered under Sections 272 and 273

                   of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 10,900 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor from

                   tanker.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of petitioner transpired on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39167 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                            2/3




          basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused Md.

          Akbar. It is submitted that petitioner is neither connected

          with tanker nor with illicit liquor in any manners and as such

          save and except suspicion arising out of disclosure made by

          apprehended co-accused, nothing further incriminating

          appears against this petitioner. It is submitted that

          admittedly the recovery of illicit liquor was not made from

          conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Explaining

          criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the petitioner found

          involved in one more criminal case but of different nature,

          where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from conscious physical possession

          of this petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named,

          in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below

          within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39167 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                                     3/3




                   (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                   each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Exclusive Special

                   Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur

                   P.S. Case No.60 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid

                   down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section

                   482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U    T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.