Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bihari KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to bond and conditions, as no prima facie case was established against them.

Summary

The petitioners, Bihari Kumar and Prem Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Thali P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026) involving alleged possession of 63 litres of illicit liquor. The police had apprehended co‑accused Nitish Kumar, who was found with the liquor, and the co‑accused’s confessional statements implicated the petitioners. The petitioners contended they were not owners of the vehicle, were absent at the time, and that the only material against them was the co‑accused’s confession, which they argued lacks evidentiary value. The State opposed the bail, citing the petitioners’ prior criminal antecedents. The High Court, after considering the lack of prima facie evidence and the petitioners’ claims of innocence, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond per petitioner, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, including cancellation of bail if undisclosed antecedents are discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the alleged offences under Sections 111(4) and 317(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a)/41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
  • Whether the confessional statements of co‑accused constitute sufficient material to deny bail.
  • Impact of the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents on the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • prohibition law
  • criminal antecedents
  • confessional statement
  • bail conditions
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39238 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2026 Thana- THALI District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bihari Kumar S/o Suresh Ram, R/o Village - Patandei, P.S. - Govindpur,
                  Dist. - Nawada.
           2.     Prem Chaudhary S/o Late Bhola Chaudhary, R/o Village - Patandei, P.S. -
                  Govindpur, Dist. - Nawada.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Sarita Kumari, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   17-06-2026                   Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioners and Ld. APP for

                   the State.

                                 2. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail, apprehending

                   their arrest, in connection with Thali P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026

                   dated 01.05.2026, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 111(4) and 317(4) of BNS and Section 30(a)/41(1) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

                                 3. As per the allegation, co-accused/Nitish Kumar,

                   who is not petitioner herein, along with co-accused/Bihari

                   Kumar, who is petitioner herein, were carrying 63 litre illicit

                   liquor keeping in bag on the motorcycle in the middle of the

                   driver and the pillion rider. When police chased them, pillion

                   rider was successful to flee away. However, Nitish Kumar, who

                   was driving the motorcycle, was apprehended on the spot with

                   recovery of the illicit liquor and as per the confessional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39238 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          statement of Nitish Kumar, petitioner/Prem Chaudhary and

          other co-accused/Pappu Chaudhary had provided motorcycle to

          him to carry the illicit liquor.

                       4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the

          Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this

          case. He further submits that petitioners have nothing to do with

          the alleged offence and they are not the owner of the vehicle,

          nor were they present at the time of the occurrence. The only

          material against the petitioners is so-called confessional

          statement of the co-accused before the police which has no

          evidentiary value and except such material, there is nothing

          against them. Hence, no prima facie case is made out against the

          petitioners.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated paragraph no.3 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner No.1 has one criminal antecedent and

          petitioner No.2 has two criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioners for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39238 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners, above-named,

                     to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender

                     before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

                     date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their

                     furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)

                     each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                     of learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Thali P.S.

                     Case No. 83 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the

                     following conditions:

                                  (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents other

                     than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail

                     bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied

                     that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents

                     despite their knowledge of the same.

                                  (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                     learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the

                     petitioners.


                                                                    (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.