Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jageshwar Mahato @ Tegar Mahato @ Tengar MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner was not in conscious physical possession of the illicit liquor and therefore granted bail subject to bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Jageshwar Mahato, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, with 60 litres of liquor recovered from an e‑rickshaw. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the recovery was linked to a co‑accused, Devanand Prasad. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents and three other cases where he is on bail. The court examined whether the recovery constituted possession sufficient for denial of bail and considered the provisions of Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Concluding that the liquor was not consciously possessed by the petitioner, the court directed his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2).

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from an e‑rickshaw amounts to conscious physical possession of the petitioner for the purpose of denying bail
  • Whether bail can be granted under Section 482(2) of the BNSS despite the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39293 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Jageshwar Mahato @ Tegar Mahato @ Tengar Mahato S/o Dhrup Mahato R/o
                 vill-Ward No 4, Nevaji Tola, Dharmsala, Dahiyawan, P.S- Town, Dist- Saran,
                 Bihar.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Anil Kr. Singh No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   18-06-2026                    Heard the parties

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No.

                   234 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be

                   engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,

                   there is recovery of 60 litres of IMFL/country made liquor

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was

                   made from e-rickshaw which is a public transport and as such

                   it can be said safely that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                   not made from conscious physical possession of the petitioner

                   and moreover, the name of this petitioner transpired on the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39293 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      basis of disclosure of the apprehended co-accused person

                      namely, Devanand Prasad. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is

                      submitted that petitioner found involved in three more criminal

                      cases where he is on bail.

                                   5 Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                      taking note of fact as recovery of alleged illicit liquor prima-

                      facie not appears to be made from the conscious physical

                      possession of the petitioner, accordingly petitioner above-

                      named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

                      below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released

                      on bail,     furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned ASJ cum Exclusive Spl. Court Excise

                      Act I, Saran at Chapra /concerned Court, where the case is

                      pending in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 234 of 2026,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                      BNSS.



                                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.