Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39490 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Yadav S/O Late Ramji Rai @ Late Ramji Yadav R/O Village-
                 Bhaisada, P.S- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Ramgadhwa P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2),

                   126(2), 117(2), 103(1) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner, along with others, has assaulted the son of the

                   informant, who is specially abled.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that the FIR is in two parts; in the first
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39490 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




          part, there is specific allegation against one Sanjeet Yadav, who

          has beaten badly the son of the informant. In the second part of

          the FIR, it is alleged that all the accused persons have assaulted

          the son of the informant who succumbed to the injuries. He

          further submits that the nature of the allegation is general and

          omnibus and from perusal of the post-mortem report of the

          deceased, it will transpire that the doctor conducting the autopsy

          of the deceased has found the following:

                       (i) Deformity on the right thigh, with cutting blood

          and blood clot present with fracture of the right femur at

          midpart

                       (ii) Bruise on the back of the chest measuring 5"x3",

          and the doctor conducting the autopsy of the deceased has

          opined that the cause of death is hemorrhage and shock.

                         5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          Sanjeet Yadav, who was having a specific allegation of

          assaulting the deceased, has been granted bail by the learned

          coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 22256 of

          2026. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing.

          Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition

          that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing

          in judicial custody since 15.12.2025.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39490 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  6. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     S.D.J.M., Motihari at East Champaran in connection with

                     Ramgadhwa P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T