Patna High Court
Mausam KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear.
Summary
Mausam Kumari filed an application in the Patna High Court arising from a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates of 08-12-2025 and 09-01-2026, despite repeated calls. Counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present, but no representative appeared for the petitioner. The court noted the petitioner’s non‑appearance and, in accordance with procedural rules, dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava.
Issues considered
- Should the application be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court?
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
- petitioner's default
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39546 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE
District- Begusarai
======================================================
Mausam Kumari Wife of Gendaui Paswan@ Gaurav Kumar D/O Prakash
Paswan Resident Of Village-Begampur,P.O- Chhtauna,P.S.-
Nawkothi,District-Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Gendaui Paswan @ Gaurav Kumar S/O Chandradeo Paswan R/O Village-
Menka, P.S.-Muffasil(Lakho O.P) District-Begusarai.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
5 13-01-2026 It appears from the records that no one had appeared
on behalf of the petitioner on 08.12.2025 and also on
09.01.2026. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and
learned APP for the State are present.
2. Today also on repeated calls, no one appears on
behalf of the petitioner to press the application.
3. In such view of the matter, the application is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-
U T
Checking your session…