Md. Mujlim @ Md. MujamilversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39552 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- Rajeshwari District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Mujlim @ Md. Mujamil S/o Md. Jahir Resident of Village - Chakardaha,
                 Ward no. - 15, P.S. - Narpatganj, Dist. - Araria.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Arun Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Section 30(a) pf the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

                   2022.

                                 3. The recovery is of 702 liters of illicit liquor from a

                   scorpio vehicle of which the petitioner is said to be the driver.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 23.03.2026.

                                 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable

                   organization without accepting his guilt. He further submits that

                   the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




                        6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                        7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let

          the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned

          Court below in connection with Rajeshwari P.S. Case No. 44 of

          2026.

                        8. This is also subject to the condition that the

          petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in

          Ramakrishna Math, Bhatta Bazar, Purnia and produce the

          receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail bonds of

          the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the genuineness

          of the receipt produced by the petitioner.

                       9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after

          being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at

          Narpatganj Police Station on first and third Sunday of each

          month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result

          in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

                          10. As the petitioner claims to have clean

          antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39552 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                      3/3




                    the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the

                    petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other

                    case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.

                                    11. It is, however, clarified that the observations

                    made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                       (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U