Ravi Shankar kumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39562 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2025 Thana- VIDYAPATINAGAR District-
                                                        Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Ravi Shankar Kumar S/O Upendra Ray Resident of Village- Dumari Dakshni,
                 Police Station- Mohanpur, Distt- Samastipur      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Prem Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                    Heard Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr.Prem Kumar Jha, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S.Case No.169 of 2025,FIR

                   dated 10.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Section 310(2) of BNS.

                                3. The FIR of the occurrence of loot is against

                   unknown.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The

                   allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the

                   petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR.

                   The name of the petitioner has been transpired during

                   investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39562 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          accused person, namely, Randhir Kumar and nothing has been

          recovered from conscious possession or the house of the

          petitioner and except the confessional statement of the co-

          accused, nothing has come during investigation against the

          petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the

          present occurrence.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Further submits

          that the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present

          one but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in both the

          cases, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, nothing has been

          recovered from conscious possession or the house of the

          petitioner and the name of the petitioner has been transpired

          during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement

          of co-accused person, let the petitioner, above named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

          period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in

          connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S.Case No.169 of 2025,
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39562 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                         3/3




                       subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of

                       the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the

                       BNSS,2023 and with other following conditions:-

                                    (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                       properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                       and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                       on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                       reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                    (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                       witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                       for cancellation of bail.

                                    (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                       verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                       any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her

                       criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                       cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                       acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                       shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                       verification.



                                              (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U        T