Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dr. Keshar Naman Kumar Pandey @Keshar Naman Kumar Pandey@Kesh Nayan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied as the allegations of cheating were deemed serious enough to warrant arrest.

Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Keshar Naman Kumar Pandey, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Dhansoi Case No.104 of 2024) filed under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code alleging cheating of Rs.13,18,500. The petitioner claimed innocence and a clean antecedent, while the State opposed the bail. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations and the nature of the offences. Concluding that the allegations were sufficient to deny anticipatory bail, the court dismissed the application. The petitioner was ordered to surrender within four weeks and seek regular bail, failing which the police would arrest him.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged cheating offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • cheating
  • IPC 420
  • IPC 406
  • bail denial
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39646 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Dr. Keshar Naman Kumar Pandey @Keshar Naman Kumar Pandey@Kesh
                 Nayan Pandey S/O Dayanand Pandey R/O Village- Sadarpur, P.S- Bind,
                 Distt.- Nalanda.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Bir Bahadur Singh S/O Munmun Singh R/O Village- Dhansoi, P.S- Dhansoi,
                 Distt.- Buxar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   10-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 104 of 2024 instituted under

                   Sections 420, 406 of the I.P.C.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to

                   have cheated informant and six persons an amount of Rs.

                   13,18,500/- in the name of providing jobs.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has not cheated anyone. Petitioner has clean

                   antecedent.

                                5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39646 of 2025(5) dt.10-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the allegations levelled against the

                        petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

                        the petitioner.

                                     7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                     8. The petitioner is directed to surrender within four

                        weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the

                        Superintendent of Police, Nalanda will take all steps for arrest

                        of the petitioner.

                                     9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                        Superintendent of Police, Nalanda through FAX or e-mail for its

                        compliance.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.