Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sagar Dhangar @ sagar DhagarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Sagar Dhangar was arrested in a special NDPS case for alleged possession of narcotics, with 6.48 grams of smack recovered from a co-accused, Akash Dhangar. The petitioner contended that no narcotics were found in his possession and that he was merely in judicial custody since May 5, 2026, though he was accused of attempting to free Akash during the police apprehension. The State opposed bail, highlighting four prior criminal cases against the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the court considered the lack of direct recovery from the petitioner, his cooperation prospects, and the need for sureties. The court granted bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal amount, and that one bailor be a near relative, directing compliance with the Special NDPS Judge.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act and the cited provisions of the BNS Act despite alleged involvement and prior criminal antecedents.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • criminal antecedent
  • judicial custody
  • special judge

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39661 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2026 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Sagar Dhangar @ sagar Dhagar Son of Ramesh Dhangar R/o China Kothi,
                 Harijan Colony, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Special NDPS Case No. 172 of 2026 arising out of Budha

                   Colony P.S. Case No.162 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8(c) & 21(b) of the NDPS Act and

                   under Sections 109, 132, 191(2), 190 and 125 of the BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   possession of one co-accused Akash Dhangar altogether 6.48

                   gm of smack was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from

                   the possession of this petitioner. Recovery, if any, has been

                   made from possession of Akash Dhangar. The allegation against
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39661 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the petitioner is that when the police apprehended Akash, he

                      along with others attempted to release him from the police. It

                      has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial

                      custody since 05.05.2026.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is

                      having criminal antecedent of four cases.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that

                      the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and that one of the

                      bailors should be near relative of the petitioner. The above

                      named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing

                      bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court

                      of learned Exclusive Special Judge (NDPS Act) No.II, Patna in

                      connection with Special NDPS Case No. 172 of 2026 arising

                      out of Budha Colony P.S. Case No.162 of 2026



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.