Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amlen Kumar Ray @ Amlen Kumar @ Amlen Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The application for regular bail is allowed subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.

Summary

The petitioners, Amlen Kumar Ray and Vijay Kumar Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 306 litres of foreign liquor. They claimed innocence, had been in custody since 22 April 2026, and offered to donate Rs.25,000 each to a charitable organization while seeking regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the submissions, allowed the bail application subject to a cash bond of Rs.10,000 each, two sureties, a donation of Rs.25,000 each to the Ramakrishna Mission, monthly attendance at the police station, and verification of a clean antecedent. The order emphasized that the observations were prima facie and would not affect the trial. Consequently, the petitioners were released on bail under the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the Court for granting bail are lawful and appropriate.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • foreign liquor
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39738 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2026 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
           1.     Amlen Kumar Ray @ Amlen Kumar @ Amlen Kumar Yadav S/o- Ram
                  Prasad Ray R/o village - Khargama, PS- Phulparas, Dist.- Madhubani.
           2.    Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Kumar Sipaliya S/o- Kari Sipaliya R/o village -
                 Khargama, PS- Phulparas, Dist.- Madhubani.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jaishankar Kumar Yadav
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nagendra Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with

                   Phulparas P.S. Case No. 161 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   306 liters of foreign liquor from the vehicle in question.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are in custody since 22.04.2026, are quite

                   innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   He further submits that the petitioners are ready to donate Rs.

                   25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each in some charitable
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39738 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




          organization without accepting their guilt.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          and the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners, this

          application for regular bail is allowed.

                       7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on

          bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

          each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

          of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor

          Court in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 161 of 2026

          subject to condition that:-

                                               (I). The petitioners shall deposit an
                                  amount of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
                                  Thousand Only) each in Ramakrishna Mission
                                  Sevashrama, Swami Vivekananda Path, Bela,
                                  Muzaffarpur, Bihar and produce the receipt of
                                  the same before the Court below. The bail bonds
                                  of the petitioners shall be accepted only after
                                  verifying       the   genuineness   of   the   receipt
                                  produced by the petitioners.
                                               (ii). The petitioners are directed to
                                  mark their attendance at Phulparas Police
                                  Station, Madhubani on every 1st and 3rd
                                  Sunday of each month. Failure to do so, will
                                  result in cancellation of bail bonds of the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39738 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                                              petitioners.
                                                           (iii). At the time of accepting the
                                              bail bonds of the petitioners, the Court
                                              below shall verify the fact whether the
                                              petitioners have clean antecedent or not. If it
                                              is found that the petitioners have clean
                                              antecedent then only their bail bonds shall
                                              be accepted by the Court below. However, it
                                              is made clear that the acceptance of bail
                                              bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
                                              shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the
                                              name of verification.
                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.