Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Priyanka KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners.

Summary

Petitioners Priyanka Kumari and her husband Pawan Kumar, the daughter and son‑in‑law of the deceased Tiwari Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that on 16‑04‑2025 the accused assaulted and poisoned the deceased. The petitioners contended they were innocent, asserting that the deceased had committed suicide following a domestic quarrel and that the informant, a cousin, fabricated the charge to usurp property. No witness testified to seeing the petitioners commit the alleged offence. The State opposed the bail, but the court, considering the general nature of the accusation and the familial relationship, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the circumstances
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute sufficient ground to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • murder
  • false implication
  • family relationship
  • property dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4004 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
           1.     Priyanka Kumari W/o Pawan Kumar Resident of Village- Pirapur Mathura,
                  P.S- Goraul, District- Vaishali
           2.    Pawan Kumar S/o Subodh Singh Resident of Village- Pirapur Mathura, P.S-
                 Goraul, District- Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners      :        Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. II, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                  2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103 and

                   3(5) of the B.N.S..

                                  3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on

                   16.04.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including

                   these petitioners, committed maar-peet with Tiwari Singh and

                   subsequently, killed him by administering poison.

                                  4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and

                   have committed no offence. Petitioner No. 1 is none else than
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4004 of 2026(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/3




          own daughter of the deceased and Petitioner No. 2 is husband of

          Petitioner No. 1 and son-in-law of the deceased. Petitioners are

          living far away from the place of occurrence. As a matter of

          fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, there was a

          quarrel between the deceased and his wife and due to the same,

          the deceased committed suicide by consuming poison and

          informant, who happens to be cousin brother of the deceased,

          only with a view to grab the property of the deceased, falsely

          implicated these petitioners. During investigation, none of the

          witnesses have claimed to have seen these petitioners

          committing the alleged offence.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the

          petitioners.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and relationship

          between the parties, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to

          the petitioners is allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within

          a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named

          petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4004 of 2026(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                                         3/3




                       amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Vaishali at

                       Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025,

                       subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

                       B.N.S.S..



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.