Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

MOHIT KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as the recovery of illicit liquor was not shown to be from his conscious possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 27 litres of illicit liquor and violation of Sections 272, 273 IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed that his motorcycle, which was used to transport the liquor, had been lent in good faith to a family acquaintance, Govind Kumar, without his knowledge of the illicit activity. The State opposed his application for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered in connection with the case. The Court examined the factual submissions and noted that there was no prima facie evidence of the petitioner's conscious possession. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bail bond and sureties, and in accordance with Sections 438(2) CrPC and 482(2) B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner despite the allegations of possession of illicit liquor under Sections 272, 273 IPC and Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • criminal procedure
  • excise law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40145 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2023 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Mohit Kumar Chaudhary S/O Bednath Chaudhary @ Vaidyanath Chaudhary
                 R/O Village-Jagatpur, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani
                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Shabina Talat, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-06-2026               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                             2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No.

                   267 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                             3. The allegation against the petitioner is to have in

                   possession of 27 litres of illicit liquor from the motorcycle bearing

                   Registration No. BR32AM-9968, and engaged in illegal trade of

                   illicit liquor.

                             4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   submitted that out of family acquaintance, the petitioner provided

                   his motorcycle to one Govind Kumar in good faith for his personal

                   use, but subsequently his motorcycle was misused by Govind
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40145 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                                       2/2




                     Kumar for carrying illicit liquor. It is submitted that said act of

                     Govind Kumar was not within the knowledge of this petitioner

                     and, therefore, it can be safely said that recovery of illicit liquor

                     was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner, who

                     claims to be a man of clean antecedent.

                              5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for

                     anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                              6. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by

                     taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima-facie not

                     appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner,

                     who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above-named

                     petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of

                     four weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on

                     furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                     Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Madhubani/concerned court in

                     connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 267 of 2023, subject to the

                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section

                     482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short

                     “B.N.S.S.”).


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.