Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kailash Paswan @ KailashversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no prima facie evidence of conscious possession of the illicit liquor.

Summary

The petitioner, Kailash Paswan, was not named in the FIR but was implicated because illicit liquor was recovered from a Bajaj Discover motorcycle registered in his name, which he had lent to co-accused Rohit Kumar. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that the recovery was not made from his direct control. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his application for anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that, prima facie, the liquor was not in the petitioner's possession. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a person not named in the FIR but alleged to be linked to the recovery of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the recovery of liquor from the petitioner's vehicle constitutes conscious possession sufficient to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • possession
  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40239 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Kailash Paswan @ Kailash, S/o Ram Sharan Paswan, R/o Village-Rasalpur
                 Nista, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Chitransh Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR

                   and apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar Excise

                   P.S. Case No.95 of 2026 registered under Sections 30(a) of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 16 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4.    It is submitted by learned counsel appearing

                   appearing for the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit

                   liquor was not made from conscious possession of this

                   petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner was implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40239 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                            2/3




          with present case being the registered owner of the Bajaj

          Discover motorcycle from where alleged recovery of illicit

          liquor was made. It is submitted that the petitioner has

          provided his motorcycle to co-accused Rohit Kumar in good

          faith. It is submitted that co-accused Rohit Kumar got

          apprehended by the police with the bike of petitioner

          carrying      illicit   liquor.     The      petitioner   claimed   clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Special Judge-1st (Excise Act),

          Darbhanga in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No.95
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40239 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                     Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the

                     BNSS.


                                                     (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.