Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravindra Mandal @ Ravindra Prasad Mandal @ Ravindra Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied because the offence under the NDPS Act and the petitioner’s prior similar conviction justified refusal.

Summary

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that 4.04 grams of brown sugar, a mobile phone and Rs.3,060 were recovered from a co‑accused who identified the petitioner as an accomplice. The petitioner also has a prior criminal antecedent of a similar nature. The court examined the nature of the contraband recovered and the petitioner’s past record. Considering these factors, the court held that the seriousness of the offence and the prior conviction warranted denial of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act given the recovery of contraband and his prior criminal antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • NDPS Act
  • contraband
  • prior criminal antecedent
  • bail denial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40264 of 2026

                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Mandal @ Ravindra Prasad Mandal @ Ravindra Kumar Mandal
                 Son of Babu Lal Mandal Resident of Village- Ogery, P.S.- Kahalgaon,
                 District- Bhagalpur.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) and

                   21(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, 4.04 grams of brown

                   sugar, a mobile phone and cash of Rs. 3,060/- was recovered

                   from the apprehended co-accused person who disclosed the

                   name of this petitioner as one of his accomplice. Appellant has

                   got one criminal antecedents of similar nature.

                                4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                   case, recovery of contraband substance and fact that petitioner
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40264 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
                                                         2/2




                       has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature, the prayer for

                       grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.