Patna High Court
Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was denied because the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle containing the seized illicit liquor established sufficient suspicion of involvement.
Summary
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered 630 litres of illicit liquor from a vehicle registered in his name. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was contraband under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and that the petitioner, as the vehicle owner, was implicated. The petitioner argued that no incriminating material was found in his personal possession and that his involvement was merely speculative. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the large quantity of liquor seized from the petitioner’s vehicle. The Court, noting the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle from which the illicit liquor was recovered, declined to grant anticipatory bail, concluding that ownership alone sufficed to raise a reasonable suspicion of involvement.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the accused is the registered owner of a vehicle from which illicit liquor is seized
- Whether mere ownership of the vehicle constitutes sufficient grounds for suspicion under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- illicit liquor
- vehicle ownership
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40344 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2025 Thana- Rangara District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Manoj Kumar S/o Dhiraj Rai R/o Vill- Sahdulapur Chakfarid, P.S.- Bidhupur,
Distt- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for
the offences punishable under section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition
and Excise Act.
3 . As per prosecution case , 630 liters of illicit liquor
was recovered from the seized vehicle of which this petitioner
is registered owner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no
incriminating material has been recovered from conscious
possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no concern with
the alleged recovery and he has been made accused in this case
only on suspicion .
5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40344 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
2/2
bail of the petitioner and submitted that huge quantity of liquor
has been recovered from seized vehicle of which this petitioner
is registered owner.
6. Considering the fact that petitioner is owner of the
seized vehicle from which huge quantity of illicit liquor has
been recovered, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is
refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/Sanjay-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.