Patna High Court
Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted subject to conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was charged under Sections 115(2), 125(A) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting a professor who caught him cheating. His earlier bail application was rejected, and the trial had been delayed with no witnesses examined after charge framing. Counsel argued that the prolonged custody and clean antecedent warranted bail. The State opposed regular bail. Considering the delay and the petitioner’s circumstances, the High Court allowed the bail application, ordering release on a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties and imposing conditions of regular police attendance and non‑intimidation of the informant. The order was limited to bail and did not prejudice the merits of the case.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the nature of the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
- Whether the delay in trial and lack of witness examination justify bail
- Whether conditions can be imposed on bail to protect the informant
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 125(A)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- trial delay
- assault
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- conditions of bail
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40426 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
======================================================
Sachin Kumar Son of Ghanesar Yadav @ Dhaneshwar Yadav Resident of
Mohalla- Mahkar, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Durgesh Nandan, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the
petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case
No. 779 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections
115(2), 125(A) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has
been rejected vide order dated 19.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.
No. 72197 of 2025.
4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to
have assaulted the professor who had caught him cheating.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
trial has been delayed as after framing of charge no witnesses
have been examined. The petitioner is in custody since
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40426 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
2/3
27.07.2025 having clean antecedent.
6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the delay in trial and the period of
custody, this application is allowed.
8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be
released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge Vth
Nawada/ concerned Court below in connection with Nawada
Town P.S. Case No. 779 of 2025.
9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after
being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Roh
Police Station, District- Nawada on the first and third Sunday of
the month. Any default in appearance at the police station will
result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
10. Further, the grant of bail is also subject to the
condition that the petitioner shall not intimidate or threaten the
informant, who is the professor of the petitioner.
11. It is, however, clarified that the observations made
herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40426 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
3/3
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.