Patna High Court
Arbind TiwariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no material evidence of his complicity and that the statutory conditions for denial under Section 76(2) were not satisfied.
Summary
The petitioner, Arbind Tiwari, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Kuchila P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 50.295 litres of illicit liquor were seized from two motorcycles, one of which was registered in his name. He contended that he was merely the registered owner of the motorcycle, that the vehicle was being used by another person, and that there was no material linking him to the seized liquor, also raising procedural irregularities under Sections 103 and 105 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, arguing that the use of his motorcycle indicated complicity, invoking Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The Court examined the lack of substantive evidence of the petitioner's participation and noted his clean antecedent, finding that the statutory rigors of Section 76(2) were not triggered. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close relative, and subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The order directed compliance with the Special Judge (Excise‑II) Kaimur within four weeks of receipt of the order.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be denied under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 when the petitioner is only the registered owner of a vehicle used in the alleged offence.
- Whether the seizure and search complied with Sections 103 and 105 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether there is sufficient material evidence to establish the petitioner's complicity in the alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103, 105, 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — s. 76(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- search and seizure
- motor vehicle ownership
- section 30(a)
- section 76(2)
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- fair antecedent
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40501 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2025 Thana- KUCHILA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
Arbind Tiwari, S/o Laxman Tiwari @ Lakshman Tiwari, Resident of Village-
Ojhawaliya, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas at Sasaram
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-07-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Kuchila P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025 registered for
the offences under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Allegedly in course of vehicle checking, the police
intercepted two motorcycles and apprehended three persons and
in course of search altogether 50.295 litres of illicit liquor was
recovered.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
only on account of the petitioner being the owner of one of the
motorcycle, in question, bearing registration no. BR24AK 3295,
his name has been implicated in this case without there being
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40501 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
2/3
any cogent material showing nexus of the petitioner with the
apprehended person or the alleged recovered illicit liquor. In
fact, prior to the occurrence, the motorcycle was being run by
one Abhinandan Yadav, who has undertaken that he will
purchase the said motorcycle, but till date the same could not be
done and the ownership has not been transferred. There is
serious discrepancies in the search and seizure, besides defiance
of Sections 103 and 105 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he
undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceedings of the
court.
5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State
opposes the bail application and submits that use of the
motorcycle of the petitioner in the crime clearly suggests his
complicity, hence the anticipatory bail is not maintainable in
accordance with Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act, 2016.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by
the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note
of the fact that save and except the allegation that the petitioner
being the owner of the motorcycle, in question, his name has
been implicated in this case, but without there being any cogent
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40501 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
3/3
material suggesting his complicity, as also the fact that the
petitioner bears fair antecedent and there is lack of materials
which attract the rigors provided under Section 76(2) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, let the petitioner, named
above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court
below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of
a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds
of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge
(Excise-II) Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Kuchila P.S.
Case No. 02 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down
under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors
shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.