Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raju Kumar (Chaukidar)versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the alleged assault did not prima facie demonstrate an intention to cause death, and therefore bail was granted.

Summary

The petitioners Raju Kumar, Shyam Babu Paswan and Vinod Paswan were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with an iron rod and sword, causing injuries. They contended that the injuries were minor, inflicted on non‑vital parts, and that there was no intention to cause death, also asserting a clean antecedent. The prosecution argued that the FIR specifically implicated them in the assault. The court examined whether the facts established a prima facie case under Section 109 of the BNS, considering the nature of the weapons, the body parts injured, and the lack of repeated or aggravated conduct. Finding that the assault did not appear to be repeated, was on non‑vital parts, and did not demonstrate intent to cause death, the court concluded that the petitioners were entitled to bail. Accordingly, the petitioners were ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each.

Issues considered

  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute a prima facie case under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 indicating intention to cause death.
  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the nature and extent of injuries and the alleged intent.
  • Whether the petitioners' claim of a clean antecedent affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • intention to cause death
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • prima facie
  • clean antecedent
  • Criminal Procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40832 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2026 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Raju Kumar (Chaukidar), S/o Shyam Babu Paswan,
           2.    Shyam Babu Paswan, S/o Late Munshi Paswan,
           3.     Vinod Paswan, S/o Shyam Babu Paswan,
                  All are resident of Village- Badaki Mahammadpur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur,
                  Distt.- Patna.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioners
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR

                   and      apprehending         their    arrest      in    connection        with

                   Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.141 of 2026 registered under

                   Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 118(1), 109,

                   329(4), 324(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) Bhartiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNS’) and Section 27 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioners along with 17 named co-

                   accused persons assaulted the informant and his family

                   members by using iron rod and sword, causing head and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40832 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/4




          bodily injuries, having intention to cause their death. It is

          alleged that the occurrence took place in the background of

          previous enmities.

                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

          petitioners that allegation of assault is available against 17

          named co-accused persons including these petitioners, where

          petitioner no.1 alleged to assault on the hand of injured

          Kundan Kumar by using sword, similarly, petitioner no.2

          alleged to assault Kundan Kumar again by using iron rod,

          whereas petitioner no.3 namely, Vinod Paswan alleged to

          assault Pappu Paswan by using iron rod on head. It is

          pointed out that the injuries as alleged to be caused by

          petitioner no.3, namely, Vinod Paswan, upon medical

          examination found simple in nature, whereas the injuries as

          alleged to be caused by petitioner no. 1, namely, Raju

          Kumar was on the non-vital part. It is pointed out that the

          injuries as alleged to be caused by petitioner nos. 1 and 2

          are not available on record and moreover the assault as

          alleged to be caused by these two petitioners not alleged to

          be repeated, without having any intervening circumstances,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40832 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                            3/4




          suggesting sufficiently that they were not under intention to

          cause their death. It is further argued that the present

          occurrence took place in the retaliation of Bakhtiyarpur P.S.

          Case No. 139 of 2026 lodged by petitioner no.3, namely,

          Vinod Paswan, where petitioners’ side received bodily injuries

          and to counter the aforesaid case, the present case was

          lodged. It is submitted that as to constitute a prima facie

          case under Section 109 of the BNS, several factors are

          required to be taken into consideration like, nature of

          weapons, the body parts where alleged assault was made,

          the manner of assault, the nature of injuries, conduct of

          accused persons during the occurrence, etc. In support of his

          submission, learned counsel has relied upon legal report of

          Hon’ble Supreme Court as available through State of

          Himachal Pradesh vs. Shamsher Singh [2025 SCC

          OnLine SC 807]. The petitioners claimed clean antecedent.

                        5. Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail

          submitted that the allegation as to cause physical assault is

          specifically available against these petitioners.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40832 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                       4/4




                     taking note of fact as also the overall nature of injuries,

                     where the assault as alleged prima facie not appears

                     repeated, without having any intervening circumstances,

                     where assault alleged was also made on non-vital part of the

                     body prima facie negating the intention to cause death,

                     accordingly, the all above-named three petitioners, in the

                     event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a

                     period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail on

                     furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                     each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction      of    the     learned      Additional   Chief   Judicial

                     Magistrate-III, Barh, Patna in connection with Bakhtiyarpur

                     P.S. Case No.141 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid

                     down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section

                     482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                     (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.