Patna High Court
Shubham Kumar @ MotiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, was arrested on 28 April 2026 in connection with an assault and theft incident reported on 22 April 2026, alleged under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on an informant’s report and a self‑confessional statement recorded on 27 April 2026, with a motorcycle allegedly recovered from a co‑accused’s house. The petitioner contended that he has a clean antecedent, was initially not named in the FIR, and that no material has been recovered from his possession, arguing that his implication is false. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the confessional statement and the recovered motorcycle. The Court, noting the petitioner’s clean record and lack of concrete evidence against him, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence or witnesses. The bail order also directed that verification of antecedent should not delay the acceptance of the bond.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether the self‑confessional statement and recovery of a motorcycle from a co‑accused justify denial of bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean criminal antecedent warrants the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 309(4)
Subjects
- bail
- Section 309(4) BNS
- assault
- theft
- criminal antecedent
- self‑confessional statement
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40834 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2026 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Shubham Kumar @ Moti Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh Resident of
Village - Ubhwa-Saranpur, P.O. - Rampur Rudra, P.S. - Panapur, District -
Saran at Chapra-841424
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jeetendra Narayan
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
28.04.2026 in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 159 of
2026 for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the
BNS.
3. According to prosecution case, one Vikash Kumar
(Informant) furnished a typed report to the SHO of Panapur P.S.
on 22.04.2026 at 13:15 hours stating therein that on 21.04.2026
he was returning from Siwan by way of Mashrak station by
cycle at about 10:00 O'clock night the informant reached at
Pokhrera village where from four unknown persons stopped him
they were on two Splendour Plus Motorcycles. Four unknown
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40834 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
2/4
persons caught to the Informant wherefrom one person arms
with Katta assaulted on the head of him resulting blood was
oozing and one persons snatched Oppo F27 5G mobile phone
wherein SIM No. 9608419482 was built and the accused
persons flee away towards Pokhrera Taraiya Road. On the basis
of the aforesaid written report an FIR was registered as Panapur
P.S. Case No. 159 of 2026 dated 22.04.2026 for the alleged
offences punishable under sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that initially
the petitioner was not named in the FIR and the name of the
petitioner has transpired during the course of investigation on
the basis of self confessional statement of the petitioner which is
recorded on 27.04.2026. It is next submitted that nothing has
been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner
and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution and
petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that on the basis of self confessional statement of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40834 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
3/4
petitioner, one motorcycle in question was recovered from the
house of co-accused person.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
and the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent, let the
petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate-Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with
Panapur P.S. Case No. 159 of 2026, subject to the following
conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40834 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
4/4
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.