Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj Manjhi @ Pankaj HajaraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as the recovery did not prima facie establish his possession of the illicit liquor.

Summary

The petitioner, Pankaj Manjhi, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly engaging in the illegal trade of liquor, with 18.9 litres of illicit spirit recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that his name was listed solely based on a chowkidar's disclosure and that he neither owned nor had any connection with the motorcycle from which the liquor was seized, arguing that there was no conscious possession on his part. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petitioner's request for anticipatory bail. The Court examined whether the recovery of liquor could be said to be in the petitioner's possession and considered the applicability of Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Concluding that the facts did not demonstrate possession, the Court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in the context of alleged illegal liquor possession.
  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from a motorcycle not owned or controlled by the petitioner constitutes 'possession' for the purposes of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40836 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Pankaj Manjhi @ Pankaj Hajara S/O Parma Manjhi @ Parma Hajra R/o -
                 Kahla, P.S - Barauli, District - Gopalganj

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Barauli P.S. Case

                   No.73 of 2025 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 18.9 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of petitioner arrayed solely on

                   the basis of disclosure made by the local chowkidar. It is also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40836 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that the recovery of illicit liquor was made from

          motorcycle where petitioner is neither owner nor connected

          in any manner with the alleged motorcycle. It is also

          submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from

          conscious possession of this petitioner. Explaining criminal

          antecedent, it is submitted that the petitioner found involved

          in three more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge

          XIII cum Special Excise, Court No. I, Gopalganj, in

          connection with Barauli P.S. Case No.73 of 2025, subject to
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40836 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                         CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                               (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
aniket/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.