Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bimla DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the recovery was not prima facie in the petitioner's possession and granted anticipatory bail.

Summary

Bimla Devi was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under IPC sections 274, 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 156.105 litres recovered from her house. She contended that the house was occupied by several adult family members and that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, and that the search violated the mandatory provisions of Section 103(4) of the BNSS. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed her request for anticipatory bail. The court observed that the recovery did not appear prima facie to be from her possession and noted her clean antecedent. Consequently, the court directed that she be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond and sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovered illicit liquor can be said to be in the petitioner's possession for the purposes of IPC sections 274, 275 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the search of the petitioner's premises complied with Section 103(4) of the BNSS.
  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the facts and procedural lapses.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • illicit liquor
  • anticipatory bail
  • possession
  • search and seizure
  • IPC 274
  • IPC 275
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • CrPC 438

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40846 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2026 Thana- Narhiya District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Bimla Devi, W/o Late Yogendra Sadai @ Joginder Sadai, R/o Village-
                 Bangama, P.S.- Narhaiya, District- Madhubani
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending her arrest in connection with Narhaiya P.S.

                   Case No.30 of 2026 registered under Sections 274, 275 of

                   the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 156.105 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                  4. It is submitted that the alleged recovery of illicit

                   liquor was made from the house of this petitioner which is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40846 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/3




          occupied by different adult family members and, therefore it

          can be safely said that recovery of illicit liquor was not made

          from conscious possession of the petitioner. It is also pointed

          out that the search of house of this petitioner was not made

          in terms of mandatory provisions qua search of premises in

          view of Section 103(4) of the BNSS. The petitioner claimed

          clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, who is a lady of clean antecedent, accordingly,

          the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          Exclusive      Special      Judge,      Excise       Act,   Jhanjharpur   in

          connection with Narhaiya P.S. Case No.30 of 2026, subject
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40846 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                            (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.