Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sonam Devi @ Sonam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sonam Devi, was named in FIR No. 156 of 2025 for alleged assault on the informant's husband, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. She contended that she has a clean antecedent and was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR specifically attributes the assault to her husband, not her. The State opposed her anticipatory bail application. The Court examined the lack of any specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and her clean record. Considering these factors, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and several conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023. The bail order also imposed obligations to cooperate with the trial and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 482 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 given the allegations in the FIR.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of specific allegation against her warrant bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • assault
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4089 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2025 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Sonam Devi @ Sonam Kumari W/O Pramod Kumar Chaurasia R/O ward no.
                 03, village Hasanpur, P.O. Nayagaon, Hasanpur, Police Station Nayagaon and
                 District- Saran, Pin Code 841217, Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Avinash Chandra, Advocate
                 For the State            :       Mr. Anil Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                      Heard Mr. Avinash Chandra, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in

                   connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025, F.I.R. dated

                   23.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 74 and

                   3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                  3. Allegation against the petitioner is that she along

                   with other co-accused persons have assaulted the husband of the

                   informant on his head with Dabi due to which he received cut

                   injuries.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and she has been falsely implicated

                   in the present case. It appears from the F.I.R. that due to some
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4089 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petty dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Both the

          parties are agnates to each other and there is no specific allegation

          of any assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner and

          there is specific allegation of assault attributed against co-accused

          person, namely, Pramod Kumar who happens to be the husband of

          the petitioner.

                         5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                        6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and there is

          no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against

          her in the F.I.R., let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her

          arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty

          days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chhapra in connection with

          Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 156 of 2025, subject to the conditions as

          laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

          Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other

          following conditions :-

                       (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4089 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on

                         her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason,

                         her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for

                         cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any

                         stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed her criminal

                         antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail

                         bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in

                         terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for

                         purpose of or in the name of verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.