Patna High Court
Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad MajidversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was denied as the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents warranted denial.
Summary
The petitioner, Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad Majid, sought anticipatory bail after police, acting on secret information, raided a hotel and apprehended members of an online fraud gang who named him as an associate. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in offences punishable under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34, as well as IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d). The petitioner also has eight prior criminal convictions, which the court considered in evaluating the bail application. The court examined whether the seriousness of the alleged offences and the petitioner’s antecedents justified granting anticipatory bail. Concluding that the nature of the accusations and the petitioner’s criminal record warranted denial, the court rejected the anticipatory bail petition.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner given the serious nature of the alleged offences under the IPC and IT Act
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120B, 34, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Information Technology Act — s. 66(c), 66(d)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- cybercrime
- Indian Penal Code
- Information Technology Act
- criminal antecedent
- offence under sections 420,467,468,471,120B,34
- section 66(c)
- section 66(d)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40975 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria
======================================================
Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad Majid Son of Late Aiyub @ Md. Ayub R/O
Vill- Matiyari, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Md. Naushaduzzoha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case,
registered for offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468,
471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(c),
66(d) of the Information Technology Act.
3. As per prosecution case, on secret information, a
raid was conducted in Biryani Hotel where police personnel
apprehended two persons, who used to run a gang of online
fraud and the apprehended co-accused persons disclosed the
name of petitioner and others, as their associates. Besides this,
petitioner has got eight criminal antecedent.
4. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal
antecedent, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40975 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
2/2
rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay
U T
Checking your session…