Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhupen Uraon @ Bhupen UrawversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Since the seized liquor was not found in the petitioner's physical possession and he has a clean antecedent, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhupen Uraon, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, after three litres of liquor were recovered from his house. He contended that the seizure violated Section 103(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act because no independent witness was present and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession. The State opposed his application for anticipatory bail. The court observed that the liquor was not recovered from the petitioner's physical possession and noted his clean antecedent. Consequently, the court directed that he be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seizure of liquor complied with Section 103(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act.
  • Whether the petitioner was in physical possession of the seized liquor.
  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • search and seizure
  • clean antecedent
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41011 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-575 Year-2021 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Bhupen Uraon @ Bhupen Uraw, S/o Late Rasik Lal Uraon, Resident of
                 Village- Janta Chowk Court Station near Gumati No. 3, Ward No. 18, P.S.-K.
                 Hat, Distt.- Purnea.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sumit Kumar Bhagat, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Anil Kumar Singh-I, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-06-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with K.Hat P.S. Case

                   No.575 of 2021 registered under Sections 272, 273 of the

                   Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 3 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that the seized liquor was recovered from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41011 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                            2/3




          house of the petitioner. It is further argued that Section

          103(4) of BNSS has not been complied with qua search of

          premises,       inasmuch        as      no   independent   witness   was

          associated with the search and seizure list and the seizure

          witnesses were police personnel themselves. It is submitted

          that nothing has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner. The petitioner claimed clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, who is

          a man of clean antecedent, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-I, Purnea in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41011 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      connection with K.Hat P.S. Case No.575 of 2021, subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.