Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay Mahto and OrsversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners Sanjay Mahto, Daroji Mahto and Bansh Mahto filed an application before the Patna High Court. On 22-04-2024, none of the petitioners appeared despite repeated calls. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear before the Court

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • court appearance

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41061 of 2016
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2011 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  1. Sanjay Mahto, son of Arjun Mahto
                  2. Daroji Mahto, son of Rameshwar Mahto
                  3. Bansh Mahto, son of Janardan Mahto
                  All are resident of village – Maari, P.S. - Ven, District – Nalanda.
                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                               ... ... Opposite Party
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    22-04-2024                  None turned up on behalf of the petitioners on

                    repeated calls.

                                 2. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                                 3. This application is dismissed in want of

                    prosecution.


                                                                  (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.