Patna High Court
Rohit Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
Bail was granted as the recovery of illicit liquor could not be linked to the petitioner's conscious possession.
Summary
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Choudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 195.12 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that the liquor was seized from a tempo he owned, which is a public carrier, and that he had no conscious physical possession of the contraband. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The court examined whether the recovery could be attributed to the petitioner’s possession and found that it could not be established prima facie. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS Act.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner was in conscious physical possession of the illicit liquor recovered.
- Whether bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is warranted in the circumstances.
- Whether the provisions of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances (BNSS) Act — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- bail
- illicit liquor
- possession
- prohibition act
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41145 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2022 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Rohit Kumar Choudhary S/o Awdesh Kumar Choudhary @ Avdesh
Choudhary R/o Village - Tetri, P.S - Naugachia, District - Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 23-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Defects as pointed out by the office be ignored for
the present.
3. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and
apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalpur (Rangra)
P.S. Case No. 456/2022 registered for the offences punishable
under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is to be
engage in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,
there is recovery of 195.120 litres of IMFL/country made liquor.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that petitioner implicated with the present
recovery of illicit liquor only for the reason as he is the owner of
the tempo from where illicit liquor was alleged to be recovered. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 41145 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
2/2
is further submitted that tempo is a public carrier and easily
accessible by general public. It is submitted that recovery is not
made from conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is
a man of clean antecedent.
6. Learned APP, opposes the prayer for bail.
7. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances as
mentioned above as recovery of illicit liquor prima-facie not
appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of
this petitioner, accordingly the petitioner above named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court
within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail,
furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Bhagalpur/concerned
trial court where the case is pending in connection with Gopalpur
(Rangra) P.S. Case No. 456/2022 subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./ Section 482(2) of
the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Tripathi/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.