Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 122.36 litres of liquor were seized from a motorcycle and three persons, including the petitioner, were arrested. The petitioner contended that no incriminating article was found in his possession, he was not the owner of the motorcycle, and he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner’s custody since 16‑May‑2026, and his clean antecedent. The Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Excise Court, No.1, Buxar.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in view of the facts of the case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • section 30(a)
  • section 41
  • criminal procedure
  • no antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41209 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2026 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Yadav S/O Late Babban Yadav Resident of village- Govindpur, PO-
                 Korantadih, PS- Narhi, District- Balliya

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Buxar Industrial P.S.

                   Case no. 78 of 2026 registered under sections 30(a) and 41 of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, a total of 122.36 litres

                   of liquor was recovered from the motorcycle in question and the

                   three accused persons including the petitioner herein were taken

                   into custody.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no

                   incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s

                   possession and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He is not

                   the owner of the motorcycle from which the alleged recovery is said

                   to have taken place nor does he has any concern with the seized
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41209 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                     article. He is in custody since 16.5.2026 and has no criminal

                     antecedent.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in

                     the FIR, the petitioner being in custody since 16.5.2026 and

                     specially his not having any criminal antecedent, the Court

                     directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Buxar

                     Industrial P.S. Case no. 78 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of

                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special

                     Excise Court no.1, Buxar.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.