Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rambilash PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court disposed of the application as not pressed, granting the petitioner liberty to raise points at a later stage.

Summary

Petitioners Rambilash Paswan and Rajesh Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Radhey Shyam Prasad Singh. Their counsel, Mr. Kunwar Jamuar, informed the Court that he would not press the application at this stage. He requested that the Court allow him to raise any points that may become relevant later. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the requested liberty. Consequently, the application was disposed of as not pressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application should be pressed or can be deferred for later argument

Subjects

  • application disposal
  • liberty to raise points
  • criminal miscellaneous petition

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4121 of 2024
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2017 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya
                   ======================================================
              1.    Rambilash Paswan, son of Late Bharosa Paswan Village- Gamhariya Ps-
                    Dobhi Dist- Gaya
              2.   Rajesh Paswan, son of Rambilash Paswan Village- Gamhariya Ps- Dobhi
                   Dist- Gaya

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
              1.   The State of Bihar
              2.   Radhey Shyam Prasad Singh, son of Late Durga Prasad Singh Village-
                   Gamhariya Ps- Dobhi Dist- Gaya

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kunwar Jamuar, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                         ORAL ORDER

2    20-01-2026                   After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                     petitioners submit that he shall not be pressing the application,

                     however, he may be granted liberty to raise all such points

                     which is available to him at the appropriate stage.

                                  2. With the aforesaid liberty, the application stands

                     disposed off as having not pressed.



                                                (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.