Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court dismissed the bail application, refusing regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The Patna High Court considered an application for regular bail filed by Chandan Kumar, who is accused under Sections 111 and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, together with Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, for allegedly conspiring to murder a key witness in the Munna Singh murder case. The prosecution alleged that a large quantity of arms and ammunition was recovered from the petitioner’s residence and that the petitioner acted on instructions of a co‑accused who was planning the murder from jail. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, had no material linking him to the conspiracy, and was falsely implicated, despite having six prior criminal antecedents. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the substantial arms recovery. The Court, noting the gravity of the offences and the large seizure of weapons, declined to grant bail and dismissed the application, stating that its observations were prima facie and not a determination on the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for regular bail in light of the alleged conspiracy to murder and the seizure of a large quantity of arms?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • arms seizure
  • conspiracy to murder
  • criminal antecedents
  • gravity of offence
  • bail application

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41436 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar S/o Rameshwar Singh R/o vill - Matihani, ward no. 1, P.S.-
                 Matihani, P.O.- Muzapur, Banduar, Distt.- Begusarai, Bihar

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Town P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026, registered for the offence under

                   Sections 111 & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 read with Sections

                   25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

                   others have conspired to murder the key witness in the Munna

                   Singh murder case. During the investigation, police raided the

                   petitioner’s house, seizing a large quantity of arms and

                   ammunition. The petitioner was acting under the instructions of

                   a co-accused, who had planned the murder from jail.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 41436 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no

                      independent material connecting the petitioner with the alleged

                      conspiracy. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2026 having

                      six criminal antecedents.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                      opposed the prayer for bail and submits that there is huge

                      recovery of arms and ammunition from the house of the

                      petitioner

                                   6. Considering the huge recovery of arms and

                      ammunition and the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to

                      grant bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                 (Sandeep Kumar, J)
sadique/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.