Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar JhunjhunwalaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

Pawan Kumar, the owner of a printing press, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bengal Gambling Act and the Bihar Bengal Lottery Act for allegedly printing illegal lottery coupons. He applied for bail, asserting that the press was operated by Manish Kumar and that he bore no responsibility for the illegal activity, and he highlighted his clean antecedent. The State opposed bail, emphasizing his ownership of the press and citing fifteen prior criminal records, some of similar nature. The court considered the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s criminal history. Consequently, the court rejected the bail application, ordering that the petitioner remain in custody.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the owner of a printing press alleged to have printed illegal lottery coupons, considering his ownership and prior criminal antecedents.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal lottery
  • gambling law
  • printing press
  • criminal antecedents

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41445 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Jhunjhunwala S/o Girdhari Lal Jhunjhunwala
                 Resident of Village- Ward No. 36, Barah Patthar, Gali No. 09, Dehri, P.s-
                 Dehri(T),Dehri-on-sone, Bihar, PIN- 845455          ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                 ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   02-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.
                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for
                   the offence punishable under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338,
                   336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5), 111 and 297 of the Bharatiya Nyaya
                   Sanhita, 2023 and section 11 of the Bengal Gambling Act and
                   sections 3 and 4 of the Bihar Bengal Lottery Act.
                                3. As per prosecution case, petitioner is owner of the
                   printing press in which illegal lottery coupons were being
                   printed.
                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
                   submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been
                   implicated in this case. Though the petitioner was owner of the
                   Press, but the same was being run by one Manish Kumar and
                   petitioner is not responsible for his illegal act. Petitioner claims
                   clean antecedent.
                                5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer
                   for bail. He submits that the petitioner was owner of the printing
                   press in which illegal lottery coupons were being printed.
                   Besides this, petitioner has got 15 criminal antecedents in which
                   some of them are of similar nature.
                                6. Considering the nature and gravity of accusation
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41445 of 2025(6) dt.02-02-2026
                                                           2/2




                         and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, prayer for bail of the
                         petitioner is rejected.



                                               (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashi/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.