Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Mumtaz Khan @ MusamaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and specific conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Mumtaz Khan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 310(6), 310(5), 310(1), 310(4) and 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, after a pistol and live cartridges were seized from his possession. He contended that the seizure was false, that the items did not belong to him, and that there was no independent witness to the seizure list, arguing that he was not involved in any dacoity. The State opposed his bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences and his prior criminal antecedent. The Court, noting that the petitioner had been in custody since 04‑09‑2025, that charges were framed, and that he gave an undertaking to cooperate, ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of personal appearance and a family member as a bailor. The bail order was conditioned on the petitioner’s compliance, with the possibility of cancellation for non‑appearance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the seriousness of the offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023.
  • Whether the seizure of the pistol and cartridges was lawful and sufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent precludes the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • seizure of firearms
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • pre‑trial detention
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4174 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2025 Thana- ISHAKCHAK District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Mumtaz Khan @ Musama S/o Late Mustafa Khan Resident of Village-
                 Dusadhpara Ward No. 9, P.S.- Nagar Sahebganj, District- Sahebganj,
                 Jharkhand

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                  2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the

                   petitioner in connection with Ishak Chak P.S. Case no.108 of

                   2025 registered under sections 310(6), 310(5), 310(1), 310(4)

                   and 317(5) of BNS, 2023.

                                3. There is recovery of one country made pistol, two

                   live cartridges along with some incriminating articles from

                   petitioner’s possession.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that false

                   recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner being

                   that of one country made pistol and two live cartridges. It is

                   further submitted that the seized articles do not belong to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4174 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner and he was never involved in the preparation of any

          dacoity. Further, there is no independent witness to the seizure

          list indicating violation of mandatory provisions of search and

          seizure. Petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2025 and has one

          criminal antecedent, which was lodged on the same date at

          Hajipur in which he is on bail. Learned counsel for the

          petitioner further submits that he undertakes to co-operate in

          trial and charges have been framed on 24.09.2025.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

          A.P.P. for the State.

                       6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and

          circumstances of the case and also considering that petitioner

          has remained in custody since 04.09.2025 and charges have

          been framed, coupled with the undertaking given by the

          petitioner that he would be co-operating in the trial, the

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with

          Ishak Chak P.S. Case no.108 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned

          where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the

          following conditions:-

                       (I) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4174 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      family member/close relative of the petitioner.

                                   (II) The petitioner shall remain physically present in

                      the learned trial Court on each date and shall cooperate in the

                      trial. In case the petitioner is absent on the two consecutive

                      dates without sufficient reasons, the learned trial Court would be

                      at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.


                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Harsh/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.