Patna High Court
Kundan Paswan @ Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner, Kundan Paswan, was not named in the FIR relating to a robbery under Sections 309(4) and 204 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, but a co-accused’s confessional statement implicated him. All stolen items, including a mobile phone, cash and the vehicle used, were recovered from the co-accused, and the petitioner asserted a clean antecedent. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that his arrest would serve no investigative purpose since the material evidence was already secured. The State opposed bail, relying on the suspicion arising from the co-accused’s confession. The court held that, although the suspicion was prima facie, the recovery of the stolen articles and lack of direct involvement justified granting bail with conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a person not named in the FIR but implicated by a co-accused’s confessional statement.
- Whether the recovery of stolen articles from the co-accused negates the necessity of the petitioner’s arrest.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 204, 309(4)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- bail
- confessional statement
- suspicion
- recovery of stolen property
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Criminal Procedure Code
- BNSS
- investigative necessity
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41814 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2026 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Kundan Paswan @ Kundan Kumar, Son of Mukundi Paswan, Resident of
Dabudwat, Near Middle School, Shahjadpur, P.S.- Habibpur, District-
Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR
and apprehending his arrest in connection with Sabour P.S.
Case No.21 of 2026 registered under Sections 309(4) and
204 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘B.N.S.’).
3. As per FIR, unknown miscreants committed
robbery upon informant and while committing so, looted his
mobile phone and cash of Rs. 20,000/-. The accused
persons came to informant on Honda City Car.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner that one of the co-accused, namely Anmol
Kumar Mishra apprehended by the police, who in his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41814 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
2/3
confessional statement named this petitioner out of village
enmity, as both apprehended co-accused person and the
petitioner are of same village. It is submitted that the looted
mobile phone was recovered from the apprehended co-
accused and also the Honda City Car, which was used in
committing offence was recovered on the instance of
apprehended co-accused person. It is pointed out that the
cash of Rs. 500/- was also recovered from apprehended co-
accused. It is submitted that as all looted materials were
recovered from apprehended co-accused person, therefore,
arrest of this petitioner could not serve any purpose of
justice particularly, for the purpose of investigation, as same
appears almost completed. The petitioner claimed clean
antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact, as the looted articles already recovered
from the apprehended co-accused person, where name of
this petitioner prima facie, appears on the basis of suspicion
arising out of confessional statement of co-accused,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41814 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
3/3
accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his
arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four
weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
of the learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour
P.S. Case No.21 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of the
Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.