Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendra Nut @ Jitendra NatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, as the liquor was not found in his conscious possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitendra Nut, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 60 litres of liquor recovered near his house. He contended that the recovery was made in a public area, he was not present, and the liquor was not in his conscious possession; the only basis for his inclusion was a local chowkidar's disclosure. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the liquor was not prima facie in the petitioner's possession. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon surrendering within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in view of the alleged involvement in illicit liquor trade.
  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor was made from the petitioner's conscious possession, justifying denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41839 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2026 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Jitendra Nut @ Jitendra Nat S/O Late Dinesh Nut R/O Village - Isuapur, P.S-
                 Isuapur,Dist- Saran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Nalin Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case

                   No.162 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 60 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of this petitioner arrayed solely

                   on the disclosure made by the local chowkidar. It is also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41839 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was made near the

          house of the petitioner which is an open place easily

          accessible by general public. It is also submitted that

          petitioner was not present at the spot where the alleged

          liquor was seized and as also the petitioner is not in any way

          connected with the alleged seized liquor. It is also submitted

          that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious

          possession of this petitioner. Explaining criminal antecedent,

          it is submitted that the petitioner found involved in one

          criminal case, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41839 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.- 3,

                     Saran at Chapra, in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case

                     No.162 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of

                     the BNSS


                                                         (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.