Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as the recovery of illicit liquor was not made from his physical possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 330 litres recovered from a car bearing registration No. BR2K-9692. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that his name appeared only in a disclosure statement made by a co-accused driver, Manish Kumar. He also had a prior similar criminal antecedent for which he was on bail. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The Court, noting the lack of direct possession and the circumstances of the recovery, directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon surrender, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, under the conditions of Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner when the alleged illicit liquor was not found in his possession.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • excise law
  • possession
  • bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41964 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-964 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Raushan Kumar, Son of Dinesh Yadav, Resident of village - Kewal, Police
                 Station - Gurpa, District – Gayaji                        ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                 ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawada Excise P.S.

                   Case No.964 of 2025 registered under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 330 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that the alleged recovery was made from a Car

                   bearing Registration No. BR2K-9692. It is further submitted

                   that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

                   of the petitioner. It is also pointed out that the name of the

                   petitioner surfaced solely on the disclosure statement made by
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41964 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      co-accused, apprehended on spot, namely, Manish Kumar,

                      alleging that he was the driver of the said Car. The petitioner

                      has one criminal antecedent of similar nature, in which, he is

                      on bail.

                                   5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

                      bail to the petitioner.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

                      taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not

                      appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner,

                      accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his

                      arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four

                      weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on

                      furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Nawada in

                      connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.964 of 2025,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of

                      the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                     (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.