Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anil Kumar @ Anil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, as there was no prima facie material linking him to the illicit liquor possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was implicated in a case of illegal liquor trade after 1,166 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a van he allegedly drove. He was not named in the FIR and no material linked him directly to the possession of the liquor. The petitioner argued that there was no independent evidence of his involvement and highlighted his clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed anticipatory bail. The court noted the lack of physical possession by the petitioner and, considering his clean record, directed that he be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender, furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the accused is not named in the FIR and no material evidence links him to the alleged offence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act
  • clean antecedent
  • driver
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41998 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2023 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Anil Kumar @ Anil Yadav, S/o Karu Yadav, Resident of Village- Raengaini,
                 P.S- Wazirganj, District- Gaya,

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR

                   and apprehending his arrest in connection with Wazirganj

                   P.S. Case No.501 of 2023 registered under Sections 30(a)

                   and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act,

                   2018.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 1166 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the alleged recovery was made from a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41998 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                            2/3




          pick-up van bearing Registration No. BR02T-6692. It is

          further submitted that the petitioner was not apprehended

          from the spot and has been implicated as an accused solely

          on the allegation that he was the driver of the seized vehicle,

          without there being any independent material to establish his

          involvement in the alleged offence. It is also pointed out that

          nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of

          the petitioner. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, who is a

          man of clean antecedent, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-5, Gaya in
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41998 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                         3/3




                       connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No.501 of 2023,

                       subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

                       of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.