Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Upendra BinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied.

Summary

The petitioner, Upendra, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 414 of 2024) for alleged possession of 15 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from his motorcycle, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that his name was mentioned only based on local informants, while also highlighting that he is already on bail in two other excise cases. The State opposed bail, emphasizing his unclean criminal antecedent with two pending excise cases. The Patna High Court, after hearing both sides, declined to grant anticipatory bail, noting the circumstances and prior cases. However, the Court directed that if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks, the trial court must promptly decide his surrender‑cum‑bail application on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 in view of the facts and his prior criminal antecedents.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • possession of illicit liquor
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42050 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2024 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Upendra Bin S/o Chhotai Bin @ Chotai Bin R/o vill - Pachrukhiya Kala, P.S.-
                 Koilwar, Distt.- Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ramanuj Tiwary, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Pronoti Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024 lodged on 16.10.2024,

                   for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, pending in the

                   Court of Exclusive Special Excise Court No.2, Bhojpur at Ara.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   the sole petitioner and owner of a motorcycle. Total recovery of

                   15 litres of country made liquor has been made, which is the

                   subject matter of the present case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42050 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner and the alleged recovery has been

          made from a motorcycle. Counsel submits that the petitioner

          was not apprehended from the place of occurrence and his name

          has figured in this case only by virtue of the disclosure made by

          the local people. He further submits that the criminal antecedent

          of the petitioner is not clean as there are two cases pending

          against him and in both the cases, he is on bail and no recovery

          has been made.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of

          the petitioner is not clean as there are two cases pending against

          him and both the cases are registered under Excise Act.

                       6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances, this

          Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly,

          the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

                       7. However, if petitioner surrenders before the

          concerned Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today

          then in that case, the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his

          surrender-cum-bail application on the same day, specifically

          considering the ingredients of the offence, without being

          prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42050 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                         3/3




                       rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the

                       merit of this case.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.