Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

Ram Kumar and Avinash Kumar were arrested after a police raid that seized caps, wrappers and 1.5 litres of illicit foreign liquor, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. The petitioners applied for bail, contending that no incriminating material was found on them, that the seizure list was prepared in violation of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, and that they have clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail application. The court, after considering the nature of the recovery, the short period of custody and the petitioners’ clean record, ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions prescribed in Section 480(3) of the BNSS. The conditions include a close‑relative bailor, mandatory attendance on all court dates, and cancellation of bail on three consecutive absences. Consequently, the petition for bail was granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail in view of the alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016
  • Whether the alleged procedural irregularities in the seizure list (violation of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS) affect the grant of bail
  • Whether the nature of the recovery and period of custody justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • illegal liquor
  • seizure
  • BNSS
  • criminal procedure
  • sections 30

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42189 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ram Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad Sah @ Rajendra Sah Resident of Village-
                  Laheriyaganj, P.S - Madhubani, District- Madhubani
           2.    Avinash Kumar S/o Shambhu Thakur Resident of Village- Laheriyaganj, P.S
                 - Madhubani, District- Madhubani

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in

                   connection with Madhubani Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 221 of

                   2026 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a)

                   and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

                                03. As per prosecution case, police received secret

                   information about petitioners making and selling illicit foreign

                   liquor. A raid was conducted at the identified place and the

                   petitioners were apprehended and from the bags seized from the

                   spot, recovery of 500 pieces of cap of McDowell's No. 1 brand,

                   wrappers of McDowell’s No. 1 and Royal Stage brands and 1.5
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42189 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          liters of liquor apart from 115 pieces of empty bottles of

          different brand was made and the petitioners were arrested.

                       04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the

          person or possession of the petitioners. Seizure list was prepared

          in violation of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS. Learned counsel

          further submits that the petitioners have no concern with the

          place from where recovery has been shown and it is an open

          place accessible to all. The petitioners are having clean

          antecedent and they are in custody since 30.05.2026.

                       05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioners.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of recovery and period of custody of the petitioners, they

          are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

          Judge, Excise Court, Madhubani/court concerned in connection

          with Madhubani Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 221 of 2026,

          subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42189 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     and the following conditions:

                                  (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

                                  the petitioners.

                                  (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each

                                  and every date fixed by the court below.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                                  or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                                  bond of the petitioners will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.