Patna High Court
Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail is granted to Petitioners No.2 and No.3 subject to the stipulated conditions.
Summary
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑related murder case where the deceased's father‑in‑law (Petitioner No.2) and mother‑in‑law (Petitioner No.3) were alleged to have participated in the killing of their daughter‑in‑law for non‑payment of dowry. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC Sections 498A, 326, 307, 406/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and 4. The petitioners contended they had no involvement, maintained clean antecedents, and were being wrongly implicated while the primary accusation lay against the husband. The court, after hearing both sides, granted anticipatory bail to Petitioners No.2 and No.3, subject to a bail‑bond of Rs.10,000 each, two sureties, and compliance with Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The application of Petitioner No.1 was withdrawn, and the anticipatory bail application was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law accused under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act offences.
- Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute sufficient ground to deny anticipatory bail.
- Applicability of Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Dowry Prohibition Act — s. 3, 4
- Indian Penal Code — s. 307, 326, 34, 406, 498A
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- dowry death
- IPC
- Section 498A
- murder
- dowry prohibition
- bail conditions
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4226 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2023 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran
======================================================
1. Sunil Kumar Son of Ramchandra Sah Resident of Village - Sugauli Bazar,
P.S. - Sugauli, Dist. - East Champaran.
2. Ramchandra Sah Son of Badri Sah Resident of Village - Sugauli Bazar, P.S.
- Sugauli, Dist. - East Champaran.
3. Surat Devi Wife of Ramchandra Sah Resident of Village - Sugauli Bazar,
P.S. - Sugauli, Dist. - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kundan Rathore Alias Kundan Kumar, Adv
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 22-06-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with
regard to petitioner no. 1.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This anticipatory bail application with regard to
petitioner no. 1 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
5. Petitioner nos. 2 & 3 apprehend arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A),
326, 307, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4226 of 2026(5) dt.22-06-2026
2/3
the Dowry Prohibition Act.
6. Prosecution case, in brief, is that marriage of the
daughter of informant was solemnized with co-accused Sunil
Kumar in the year 2020. Thereafter, it is alleged that these
petitioners, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons,
killed the daughter of informant due to non-fulfillment of
demand of dowry of Rs. 2 lacs and a motorcycle.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.
Petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is mother-
in-law of the deceased and they are simply victims of over-
implications. Allegation against petitioners is general and
omnibus. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and they
are not concerned with family affairs of the deceased. Moreover,
thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased.
Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
8. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed
the bail application.
9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that
let the above named petitioner nos. 2 & 3 in the event of their
arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4226 of 2026(5) dt.22-06-2026
3/3
weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond
of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with
Sugauli P. S. Case No. 249 of 2023, subject to condition as laid
down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023.
10. This anticipatory bail application, accordingly,
stands disposed of.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.