Patna High Court
Vicky Tiwari @ Biki TiwariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that bail could not be granted to the petitioner.
Summary
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Vicky Tiwari, who was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act for allegedly forging an arms licence. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, disclosed eight prior criminal convictions, and had been in custody since 18 June 2025, offering to cooperate with the trial. The State, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail. Weighing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s antecedents, the Court declined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the offences under the B.N.S. and Arms Act and his criminal antecedents
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- criminal antecedents
- arms licence forgery
- Arms Act
- B.N.S.
- high court
- regular bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42310 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-653 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District-
Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Vicky Tiwari @ Biki Tiwari S/O Naradmuni Tiwari Resident of Village-
Bariswan Barhara, P.S- Shahpur, Distt.- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anish Chandra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 653/2024 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2),
61(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B) and 26 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to
be involved in forging arms license.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
counsel further submits that he has eight criminal antecedents
and he is in custody since 18.06.2025. The petitioner undertakes
to co-operate in the case/ trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42310 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
2/2
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the allegations levelled against the
petitioner as well as the criminal antecedents, this Court is not
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.