Patna High Court
Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The Court denied bail to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought bail in a case (Fatehpur PS Case No. 436 of 2023) involving alleged transport of 810 litres of illicit country-made liquor, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution’s case rested on the recovery of the liquor from motorcycles and a confessional statement of a co‑accused, while the petitioner argued that he was implicated solely on that statement and that the motorcycle in question had been sold before the raid. The petitioner, a local Panchayat Samiti member, also highlighted that he had been granted bail in six other pending cases. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the large quantity of liquor recovered, the petitioner’s alleged involvement, and his prior criminal antecedents, including two cases under the Excise Act. The Court, after considering the submissions, declined to grant bail, rejecting the petitioner's bail application.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate decision on the petitioner's bail application in the context of alleged involvement in transporting illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018?
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- illicit liquor
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42393 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2023 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
======================================================
Dinesh Yadav, s/o late Ramdev Yadav @ Late Ramadev Yadav, R/o – Village-
Tegaini, P.S. -Gurpa, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
======================== ==============================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 08-07-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection
with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2023 registered on
17.06.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of
the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per prosecution, total recovery of 810 litres of
illicit country-made liquor from different motorcycles during a
police raid, is the subject matter of the present case. It is alleged
that the petitioner was involved in transporting illicit liquor.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has falsely been implicated solely on the basis of the
confessional statement of the co-accused. It is further submitted
that no recovery has been made from the conscious possession
of the petitioner and his implication is only on the ground that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42393 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
2/2
he was the registered owner of one of the motorcycles, which
had already been sold prior to the occurrence and the process of
transfer of vehicle is in process. It is also submitted that the
petitioner is a local Panchayat Samiti Member. Though the
petitioner is accused in six more criminal cases, but in all the
cases, he has been granted bail.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner and submits a huge quantity of 810 litres of
country-made mahua liquor was recovered during the raid and
the petitioner has been named in connection with one of the
motorcycles used for transporting the illicit liquor. It is further
submitted that the petitioner has six criminal antecedents and
out of six, two cases are lodged under Excise Act.
6. In this background, this Court is not inclined to
grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of
the petitioner in connection with Leheriasarai P.S. Case No. 204
of 2026, pending before the learned Exclusive Special Excise
Court No.-04, Gaya is hereby rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Manshi/Ashwini
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.