Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The Court denied bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, sought bail in a case (Fatehpur PS Case No. 436 of 2023) involving alleged transport of 810 litres of illicit country-made liquor, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution’s case rested on the recovery of the liquor from motorcycles and a confessional statement of a co‑accused, while the petitioner argued that he was implicated solely on that statement and that the motorcycle in question had been sold before the raid. The petitioner, a local Panchayat Samiti member, also highlighted that he had been granted bail in six other pending cases. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the large quantity of liquor recovered, the petitioner’s alleged involvement, and his prior criminal antecedents, including two cases under the Excise Act. The Court, after considering the submissions, declined to grant bail, rejecting the petitioner's bail application.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the petitioner's bail application in the context of alleged involvement in transporting illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42393 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2023 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Dinesh Yadav, s/o late Ramdev Yadav @ Late Ramadev Yadav, R/o – Village-
                 Tegaini, P.S. -Gurpa, District-Gaya.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================== ==============================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                    Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 436 of 2023 registered on

                   17.06.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                3. As per prosecution, total recovery of 810 litres of

                   illicit country-made liquor from different motorcycles during a

                   police raid, is the subject matter of the present case. It is alleged

                   that the petitioner was involved in transporting illicit liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated solely on the basis of the

                   confessional statement of the co-accused. It is further submitted

                   that no recovery has been made from the conscious possession

                   of the petitioner and his implication is only on the ground that
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42393 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                      2/2




                    he was the registered owner of one of the motorcycles, which

                    had already been sold prior to the occurrence and the process of

                    transfer of vehicle is in process. It is also submitted that the

                    petitioner is a local Panchayat Samiti Member. Though the

                    petitioner is accused in six more criminal cases, but in all the

                    cases, he has been granted bail.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                    bail of the petitioner and submits a huge quantity of 810 litres of

                    country-made mahua liquor was recovered during the raid and

                    the petitioner has been named in connection with one of the

                    motorcycles used for transporting the illicit liquor. It is further

                    submitted that the petitioner has six criminal antecedents and

                    out of six, two cases are lodged under Excise Act.

                                 6. In this background, this Court is not inclined to

                    grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of

                    the petitioner in connection with Leheriasarai P.S. Case No. 204

                    of 2026, pending before the learned Exclusive Special Excise

                    Court No.-04, Gaya is hereby rejected.



                                                (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Manshi/Ashwini

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.