Patna High Court
Ved Prakash GuptaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the application and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application so that he could raise all points available to him and the ground pleaded at the time of framing of charge. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission for withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Praveen Kumar allowed the prayer, granting liberty to withdraw the application. The application was disposed of as withdrawn. The court expressly clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application.
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural order
- criminal miscellaneous
- court discretion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42421 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2011 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura
======================================================
Ved Prakash Gupta S/o Sri Ram Sharan R/o Mohalla 302, Panchratan
Apartment Kasturba Path, Boring Road, Jamuna Apartment, VTC- Paltiputra,
P.O. and P.S.- Patliputra, Dist.- Patna, at presently posted as Medical Officer,
Primary Health Centre, Kumarkhand, District-Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Patil, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 10-04-2026 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw this application, so as to raise all
the points available to him and also the ground pleaded in this
application at the time of framing of charge.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of this case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U T
Checking your session…