Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Punam LimbuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Punam Limbu, applied for bail in a case registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged offences under Sections 8(c) and 21(b). The prosecution alleged that 25.65 grams of brown sugar and foreign Nepali cash were recovered from the petitioner’s possession, suggesting involvement in drug peddling. The petitioner had been in custody since 21 March 2026. The Court examined the nature of the recovery and the seriousness of the alleged offences. Concluding that the petitioner appeared to be a drug peddler, the Court declined to grant bail. The application was dismissed, with the Court noting that its observations were limited to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act given the recovery of narcotics and foreign cash.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • narcotics
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42472 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Punam Limbu S/O Mahendra Limbu @ Mahendra Kumar Samwahamphe
                 R/O Vill.- Shivsatakshi Nagarpalika ward no. 03, P.s.- Dharampur, District-
                 Jhapa, Nepal

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Dighalbank P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the Narcotics Drugs

                   and Psychotropic Substance Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   25.65 gram brown sugar and other materials including foreign

                   nepali cash from the possession of the petitioner.

                                 4. The petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2026.

                                 5. Considering the recovery from the petitioner and

                   also the fact that the petitioner appears to be a drug peddler, I

                   am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42472 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.