Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Siddhu Chauhan @ Sudhir ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the allegations were limited and he was not named in the FIR.

Summary

The petitioner, Siddhu Chauhan, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 103(1), 61 and 238 of the B.N.S., alleging that he helped dispose of a dead body near a riverbank. The prosecution alleged that he aided co‑accused persons in the disappearance of the body, but his name did not appear in the First Information Report; it surfaced only later through the confessional statement of co‑accused Kamlesh Kumar. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, at most, only Section 238 (concealment of a dead body) could be attracted against him and that the material evidence limited the charge to that offence. The State opposed bail, relying on the FIR allegations. The Court, noting that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and that the investigation material pertained solely to disposal of the body, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is not named in the FIR but is implicated through a co‑accused’s statement.
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioner are limited to an offence under Section 238 of the B.N.S. warranting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • FIR
  • Section 238
  • disposal of dead body
  • non‑accused
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4271 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-523 Year-2025 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Siddhu Chauhan @ Sudhir Chauhan S/o Late Dukhi Chauhan R/o Village-
                 Noniya Bigha, Dharampur, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61, 238 of the

                   B.N.S.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   alleged to have aided and facilitated the accused persons in

                   causing the disappearance of the body of the deceased by

                   disposing of the same near the river shore.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it

                   would be apparent from the First Information Report itself that

                   a dead body had been recovered by the Chaukidar, who is the

                   informant and Ashok Chauhan, Vicky Kumar, Kamlesh Kumar

                   and Ranju Devi were made accused along with 8 to 10
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4271 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          unknown persons. The petitioner was not named accused in the

          First Information Report, his name transpired during the course

          of investigation in the confessional statement of Kamlesh

          Kumar. It has been stated that it was actually co-accused Ashok

          Chauhan, who was fed up with his daughter fleeing from home

          time and again. The name of the petitioner transpired during

          the course of investigation in the statement of F.I.R. named

          accused, Kamlesh Kumar, whose statement was recorded and

          he has also admitted that it was his father Ashok Chauhan, who

          had killed his sister and his elder brother called some villagers

          including the petitioner for disposing of the dead body. As

          such, it is submitted that at best an offence under Section 238

          of the B.N.S. would only be made applicable against the

          petitioner. Further, the petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2025

          and charge-sheet has been submitted.

                         5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of

          bail on the basis of allegations made in the First Information

          Report.

                         6. Taking into consideration the facts and

          circumstances and considering the fact that the petitioner is not

          named in the First Information Report, coupled with the fact

          that the materials collected during the course of investigation
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4271 of 2026(3) dt.25-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        also disclose that the allegations are confined to disposing off

                        dead body, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail

                        on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        the learned J.M. 1st, Class-III, Nalanda, Biharsharif/concerned

                        Court below in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 523 of

                        2025.



                                                  (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.