Patna High Court
Radha DeviversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.
Summary
Radha Devi was arrested on 17 May 2026 in connection with a case involving the seizure of 65 litres of Nepali liquor alleged to be in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner contended that no liquor was found in her conscious possession and that the seizure was made at the location, not from her, asserting that she was falsely implicated and that mandatory provisions of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling (BNSS) Act, 2023 were not complied with. The State opposed bail, noting a similar pending case against the petitioner, but the petitioner was already on bail in that matter. The Court, considering the lack of direct possession and the alleged procedural lapses, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, presence, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order was issued subject to these conditions and without delay for verification.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted when the accused has no direct possession of the seized liquor.
- Whether alleged non‑compliance with mandatory provisions of the BNSS Act, 2023 warrants bail.
- Whether the existence of another pending case of similar nature affects the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition act
- excise
- seizure
- non‑possession
- mandatory compliance
- criminal procedure
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42714 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2026 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani
======================================================
Radha Devi W/o- Jitendra Mukhiya Resident of Village- Korahiya, P.S-
Jaynagar, District-Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 06-07-2026 Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, learned APP
for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
17.05.2026, in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 242 of
2026 corresponding to G.R. NO. 717 of 2026, F.I.R. dated
16.05.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section
30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
3. Recovery is of 65.00 litres of Nepali country made
liquor.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in the
present case on the basis of suspicion and nothing has been
recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42714 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
2/3
recovery has been made from the place of occurrence and the
petitioner has no role in the present occurrence and except the
suspicion, nothing has come during investigation to suggest the
involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and
altogether 65.00 litres of Nepali country made liquor was
recovered from the place of occurrence. He further submits that
the seizure list witnesses are police personnel so there is non-
compliance of mandatory provisions of BNSS, 2023 and the
petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the
petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case
of similar nature other than the present one but fairly submits on
the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is
on bail in the pending matter.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious
possession of the petitioner and there is non compliance of
mandatory provisions of B.N.S.S, let the petitioner, above
named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42714 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
3/3
Judge (Excise Court), Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar
P.S. Case No. 242 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 717 of
2026, subject to the following conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed her
criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.