Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Awadhesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no prima facie evidence of his conscious possession and noting non‑compliance with statutory search requirements.

Summary

The petitioner, Awadhesh Sahani, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, with 57 litres of liquor seized from a joint family house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious or exclusive possession and that the search violated Section 103(4) of the Act because no independent witness was present. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The court examined the lack of material linking the petitioner directly to the seized liquor and noted procedural deficiencies in the seizure. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender, subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite the seizure of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the seizure complied with Section 103(4) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act requiring an independent witness.
  • Whether the seized liquor establishes conscious possession of the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • seizure
  • possession
  • BNSS
  • CrPC

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42860 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2026 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Awadhesh Sahani, S/o Janakdev Sahani, R/o vill- Ward No 12, Uttari
                 Chhapara, Bahas, Ps- Sugauli, District- East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case

                   No.233 of 2026 registered under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 57 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the seized liquor was recovered from the

                   house, which is a joint family property. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42860 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that no recovery has been effected from the

          conscious and exclusive possession of the petitioner, and

          there is no material on record to establish his conscious

          possession of the alleged illicit liquor. It is argued that

          Section 103(4) of BNSS has not been complied with qua

          search of premises, inasmuch as no independent witness was

          associated with the search and seizure list and the seizure

          witnesses were police personnel themselves. The petitioner

          has five criminal antecedent of similar nature, in which, he is

          on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42860 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge-I, East

                      Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case

                      No.233 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down

                      under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of

                      the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.