Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Buchkun Urawn @ Buchkun Dhangar @ URAONversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Buchkun Urawn filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Patna High Court under the criminal procedure provisions. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be withdrawn, stating it had become infructuous. The court considered the request and exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made, and the matter was concluded.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4287 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2020 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia
                   ======================================================
                   Buchkun Urawn @ Buchkun Dhangar @ URAON S/o Late Mohru Urawn
                   Resident of - Adivasi Tola, Goriyar, District - Purnia

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                   The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner      :       Ms. Ankita Singh, Advocate
                   For the State           :       Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     08-04-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                     learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

                                  2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

                     prays for withdrawal of the present anticipatory bail petition

                     since the same has become infructuous.

                                  3. The prayer, so sought for, is accorded.

                                  4. The anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as

                     withdrawn.


                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.